dusti Posted December 23, 2009 Posted December 23, 2009 (edited) Hi all, Picked up a couple of nice sized whiting around the Roseville bridge last week ... currently in the freezer. Would you eat fish from that area? I've heard a couple of rumours lately that the area might not be so friendly? Cheers, Edited December 23, 2009 by dusti
Flattiehunter991 Posted December 23, 2009 Posted December 23, 2009 I'm pretty sure Chopper75 has eaten quite a few fish from there. I've also heard someone got some bad infection from a cut on a boat ramp there. When i fished there - it had rained recently and there was a disgusting layer of fifth sitting on the top of the water.
andrew399 Posted December 23, 2009 Posted December 23, 2009 Get into them mate, they'l put hairs on ur chest!
Jewdreamer Posted December 23, 2009 Posted December 23, 2009 Its alright mate. You won't need to take a torch next time you go fishing Only kidding, I would be far more worried by the western reaches of the harbour or the upper georges river. Cheers Chris
adjustedpete Posted December 23, 2009 Posted December 23, 2009 There is a sign under the bridge saying NOT to eat the fish from there. and if the council are admitting its a problem, it must be radioactive your choice.
prawn* Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 gota be better then parra river (chemical waste river)
Day's Fishin Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 I think its funny how theres signs saying don't eat fish from here, but its alright a kilometer or so down the river! Is there a fence around that section stopping the fish from moving out? If the fish look good & healthy then I'd eat them. We fished Bondi murk for years before the outfall went in & none of us got sick. The same thing was said then, don't eat the fish from there, their contaminated. Most of the fish caught there were kingfish,tailor etc all which travel up & down the coast Regards Jeff
Basil D Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 All to true Guys But Better safe then Sorry, I would eat fish around the heads but not parra river
dusti Posted December 25, 2009 Author Posted December 25, 2009 Thanks for the feedback ... might go with the sign in this case, happy to be risk averse
tide'n'knots Posted December 26, 2009 Posted December 26, 2009 All to true Guys But Better safe then Sorry, I would eat fish around the heads but not parra river if a jew or kingy was caught at the quarintine marker whos to say it wasnt under the gladesville bridge the night before???? seems to me that if you are eating fish from anywhere in sydney the chances are your already taking a risk that it hasnt been anywhere poluted such as the cooks river or the parramatta river! How long are fish affected by toxic pollution and when would be a safe time frame to eat them after they leave these areas? surely if these fish are that dangerous to eat the authorities would ban the taking of fish from any of these waterways - or would they? My personal opinion is eat them in moderation and there shouldnt be a problem. pete.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now