Well, Table 1 in that report makes interesting reading . . .
From a statistical anaylsis point of view they are some pretty small sample sizes and no std deviation results are listed.
A sample size of 33 prawns?? and 7 flathead? Any statisticain worth his salt would laugh at figures like that!
No details about where the fish were taken from that I could see either.
Intererstingly, the fish showing higher figures like Sea Mullet, Silver Biddie and yellowtail scad I would imagine are eaten far less than say flathead or bream. That would skew the figure upwards.
Not saying I would be disregarding the figures and be scoffing Seafood from west of the bridge, however in my opinion those analysis results are pretty damn bare.