Jump to content

Josh88

ADDICTED MEMBER
  • Posts

    1,031
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Josh88

  1. Probably try a smaller bait, i'm sure it could have swallowed it if it really wanted to but with the colder water and a slower metabolism that normal aggression isn't there. Try fresh squid gut and burst the inc sack as you put it in, i never pull a line up with one left on it.

    Still have to remember that being difficult for us is what fish do....kingies in particular!

    Good Luck :1fishing1:

    Josh

  2. Probably would've been a biggish shark that like you said didn't know it was hooked, it was just cruising around.

    If it was a ray it probably would've realised or at least stopped and sat in the sand or gone on shorter faster runs.

    would've been nice to get a look though.....next time

  3. Bummer you didnt get out to the reef. Still good to catch some new species.

    I think that may be a remora rather than a small cobia, they look very similar when small, we got a couple when we were up north last year.

    Josh

  4. I am just wondering whether the line size and capacity markings on reels are just recommendations or the maximum for that reel? I have noticed that a lot of you guys talk about using 15 or 20lb line/braid on 4000 series reels, however the markings on all my 4000 series reels have a maximum line capacity of 12lb. Is it OK to go over the line size recommendations on the reels or should I go for a larger reel?

    They are generally maximums but are in terms of monofilament line (most of the time) and with braid having a much narrower diameter, a lot more line can be put on a reel or a heavier line class.

  5. I have very strong opinons about this one.... the biggest problem with this style of boat is that Mrs Slinky won't let me buy one! :wife:

    Cheers, Slinky

    :074: Thats too bad Slinky.

    I think Boston Whaler are very good boats for bigger centre consoles. Probably good to have a look at contender as well, and another brand i'd recommend (as we own one) is Triumph, however the biggest model is only 24' but as a boat they are very good and hold many desirable features.

    Correct me if i'm wrong here but there isn't that much difference between a centre and a side console apart from helm position, affecting the layout of other parts of the boat but not the hull itself. So wouldn't this mean that how much water comes over the bow/gunwhales is more dependent on how the hull is shaped rather than where the helm is?? Although i'd imagine everyone is comparing them to say a half cab...?

    Cheers

    Josh

  6. Hi Greg,

    We have a 17' centre console and find it to be a good little boat. You can be a little bit cramped for room at times when you're moving around constantly but otherwise i think it is a good style of boat. It allows access to all sides of the boat which helps if you're fighting a dirty fish.

    I can't think of any real considerable negatives of a centre console over a side console. Probably more dependent on boat brand, model and at the end of the day which one suits your needs best.

    Cheers

    Josh

  7. I mix it up a bit, mainly go berkley, a few squidgy, the pro range x factor trigger works really well but its a bit annoying having to put it on every time, also got storms and tsunami's.

    Quite like to try the Ultrabite Slams when they are out, i don't think its too far away now.

    Josh

  8. We have got really strong stainless steel holders on our rails and they do a good job, you just have to make sure that they are really tightly connected at both the screw from the tube to the part that holds the rail and then tightly around the rail. They may need to be re-tightened before every few trips and tested but otherwise are good as you can adjust angle and height.

    Cheers

    Josh

  9. Bananas, they're real good luck :1badmood:........................only kidding i don't eat them.

    Usually don't think about food on the water and don't get hungry but always take some chips and biscuits along, plenty of water though :beersmile:

    Cheers

    Josh

  10. It's been at least 2 weeks since there was an ETEC war, must be about time now :074:

    Robbie.

    We have a 75 Mercury Optimax and really enjoy it, in this engine & the 90 the etec does hold a lower weight advantage over the opti, but the opti 75 & 90 are built on the block of the 115.

    I know every engine claims something and the optimax claims to be marginally faster and slightly better on fuel economy than the etec which is what i like to believe :thumbup:

    Both good engines, but i'll stick with the opti :biggrin2:

    Cheers

    Josh

×
×
  • Create New...