I have run Zipwakes since Oct 2022 on an FG hull (Cruisecraft EX720 Hard Top) not an Ally hull. I have 450S interceptors fitted. I don't think it matters whether the hull is FG or Ally to obtain the Zip benefit over traditional tab systems. The Zip system has a built in Gyro. Part of the setup process is to enter the hull detail: length, beam and weight. The FG/Ally hull weight difference would be accounted for here. From this data the Zipwake system calculates an Auto curve that drives the rate of interceptor deployment % at various Speeds to control Pitch and Roll detected by the Gyro. You have the flexibility to edit the curve, adjust the curve on the fly, re-enter hull parameters etc. Or switch the system to Manual and run the Zips as if they were Trim tabs.
Personally I found the factory input data for my vessel (length: 7.5m, beam: 2.5, weight: 3000kg) made the Zips Pitch control too aggressive - in a short chop the Zips were too aggressive in forcing the bow down and creating unnecessary slap. Roll control was excellent. I played with various settings over different trips and conditions and found the optimum Auto Pitch control was obtained setting Length: 6.5m - which on contemplation was probably closer to the true waterline length anyway.
I won't fill up any more space here as I know your question was specific to Ally hulls, but PM me if you want to discuss more.
Cheers Zoran
PS - I do recall watching a Youtube vid posted by a WA fisho from memory who gave a review on Zips on his 6-7m Ally boat, have you tried searching there?